The numerical simulations presented here are based on the two-dimensional
Reynolds-averaged approach.
One result of the simulations is that unsteadiness occurs clearly only for low
angles of attack. Here the flow structures are much more clearly evident than
at higher incidence, where interaction with other separation processes is
dominating. Therefore, first investigations are focused on a case with
.
Beside the mean quantities, the computational results also provide the unsteady
behavior of the entire flow field and especially the structures of the flow
behind the Gurney flap. Analysis of the time depending lift coefficient show
that it can be characterized by one dominant frequency corresponding to the
vortex shedding for all investigated cases. Table
lists the
Strouhal-number which represents the dominant shedding frequency normalized
by the flap height. The fluctuation intensity based on the RMS value of the
lift coefficient is defined by:
![]() |
(3) |
The characteristic behavior of the predicted frequencies is in good
agreement with those measured
by hot-wire anemometry [21]. For increasing flap heights the frequency decreases. At the same time however,
the experimental Strouhal-number increases and assymptotically
reaches
for very large Gurney-flaps (
).
Compared to the experiments [7,21] reporting
for
the Strouhal-number is slightly
underestimated in the computations (
).
In the case of the clean airfoil and for the smallest Gurney-flap
() almost no unsteadiness can be identified in the lift coefficient
and
remains under
. For large flap heights, the lift
fluctuations become more eminent and grow superproportionally to the
flap height in a similar manner to the extra
drag induced by the Gurney-flap. This behavior is an indication that the
intensity of vortex shedding characterized by
is responsible for
the drag augmentation.
The flow field is analyzed based on the vorticity in the
-
-plane (fig.
) where red marks clockwise rotating
vortices and blue those rotating anti-clockwise.
One single principle behavior can be observed for each flap height:
Two shear layers appear that continuously separate from the top and the
bottom end of the flap. After a short distance they start to roll up forming
alternating vortices of counteracting direction of rotation. This
phenomenon is called an absolute instability. As the mean
flow field is directed slightly downwards (
), near to the bottom
end of the flap the lower vortices dominates. The vortex street is convected
downstream until the mesh becomes too coarse to avoid its dissipation.
Although the size of typical structures depends on the flap height, the relation
is not proportional; the vortices grow slower.
The shape of the occurring flow structures is comparable to PIV measurements
for a Gurney-flap in ground effect by Zerihan and Zhang [21].
![]() ![]() ![]() |
A detailed description of the flow phenomena in the wake of Gurney-flaps
requires the dependency of the flow structures on the angle of attack to be
captured. In fig. the flow structures are plotted for
varying angle of attack (
) behind a
Gurney-flap of
. These hardly differ in frequency, intensity or
vortex size. In the case of further increased incidence
however, the intensity of vortex shedding decreases and finally is
no longer noticeable when the asymmetry between the boundary layer
thicknesses on the suction and pressure sides causes the absolute instability to
vanish. In this case, trailing edge separation on the suction side starts to
occur which dominates the complete airfoil flow.
![]() ![]() ![]() |